DPO SchoolDPO School

Art. 30 GDPR · Chapter IV: Controller and processor · Section 1: General obligations

Article 30 GDPR: Records of processing activities

Text as of 28 October 2026 Reviewed by Sergio Maldonado Elvira on 29 October 2026

Summary (not the official text)

Each controller and processor must keep a written record of processing activities with the content listed in the article and make it available to the supervisory authority on request. The obligation does not apply to an organisation employing fewer than 250 persons, unless one of the conditions in paragraph 5 is met.

Official text

Each controller and, where applicable, the controller's representative, shall maintain a record of processing activities under its responsibility. That record shall contain all of the following information:

the name and contact details of the controller and, where applicable, the joint controller, the controller's representative and the data protection officer;

the purposes of the processing;

a description of the categories of data subjects and of the categories of personal data;

the categories of recipients to whom the personal data have been or will be disclosed including recipients in third countries or international organisations;

where applicable, transfers of personal data to a third country or an international organisation, including the identification of that third country or international organisation and, in the case of transfers referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), the documentation of suitable safeguards;

where possible, the envisaged time limits for erasure of the different categories of data;

where possible, a general description of the technical and organisational security measures referred to in Article 32(1).

Each processor and, where applicable, the processor's representative shall maintain a record of all categories of processing activities carried out on behalf of a controller, containing:

the name and contact details of the processor or processors and of each controller on behalf of which the processor is acting, and, where applicable, of the controller's or the processor's representative, and the data protection officer;

the categories of processing carried out on behalf of each controller;

where applicable, transfers of personal data to a third country or an international organisation, including the identification of that third country or international organisation and, in the case of transfers referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), the documentation of suitable safeguards;

where possible, a general description of the technical and organisational security measures referred to in Article 32(1).

The records referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be in writing, including in electronic form.

The controller or the processor and, where applicable, the controller's or the processor's representative, shall make the record available to the supervisory authority on request.

The obligations referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to an enterprise or an organisation employing fewer than 250 persons unless the processing it carries out is likely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, the processing is not occasional, or the processing includes special categories of data as referred to in Article 9(1) or personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences referred to in Article 10.

Source: Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Official Journal L 119, 4.5.2016, as corrected. Only the text published in the Official Journal is authentic. © European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu

Article 30 on EUR-Lex

Text as of 28 October 2026.

This is reference material, not legal advice.

This list is under review.

Court of Justice judgments

  • C-60/22, UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    Judgment of 4 May 2023ECLI:EU:C:2023:373

    A failure to conclude a joint-controller arrangement or keep a record of processing does not by itself make processing unlawful or give a right to erasure or restriction.

    CURIAEUR-Lex

EDPB guidance

Fines

Amounts are shown in the currency in which the fine was imposed.

  • IAB Europe: EUR 250,000

    Autorité de protection des données / Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit (Belgium), BelgiumDecision of 2 February 2022Appeal status: upheld

    The ad-industry Transparency and Consent Framework processed users' preference strings without a legal basis, with vague information, weak safeguards, no records, no DPIA and no DPO.

    Source: the authority

  • Deliveroo Italy s.r.l.: EUR 2,500,000

    Garante per la protezione dei dati personali, ItalyDecision of 22 July 2021Appeal status: unknown

    Food-delivery platform managed about 8,000 riders through opaque algorithms (booking and work allocation), collected excessive data including location, and lacked a DPIA and proper records.

    Source: the authority